![]() |
Birendra Bahadur Basnet MD, Buddha Air |
What are main reasons
behind massive success of Buddha Air which, as of today, holds 56 percent
market share of domestic airlines?
Buddha Air is a common
platform for its 700 employees. We
continuously motivate employees to achieve success. We believe that all
employees should have feeling of ownership on the company. Buddha Air gives
high value to its employees for the growth of company and shares both profit
and loss with its employees. I can say that collective work of employees is the
main reason for the progress of Buddha Air so far.
How do you motivate your
employees?
All financial transaction
should be transparent. Transparency creates environment of trust between
employees and company management. Salary increment based on the inflation rate
and performance based reward system are some ways to motivate employees in a
positive manner. We provide incentives to employees. The company should hike air
fare every year to meet administrative cost including salary of employees. Yet,
we are committed to provide services at reasonable cost. We have started
providing services from big aircraft reducing number of small aircraft. On top
of all, the most important thing is economic and technical transparency.
Besides, long term vision, strategies, best products and investment are equally
important to make a company successful.
Buddha Air could not
achieve success in international flights such as Paro, Lucknow and Banaras.
What’s your say?
First, we have not give
importance to those destinations compared to domestic destinations. Our team
should have put more effort to be successful in internal market. Second, Paro
of Bhutan and Lucknow of India could not be the best flight destinations for
us. We failed to do good business in these destinations. The reason we decided
to stop our Lucknow flight was obvious. People can get there in three hours
from Nepalgunj. Passengers opt to fly to Nepalgunj and then go to Lucknow.
However, Banaras has been one of the lucrative flight routes to us. We will be
continuing our service to Banaras.
Indian airline companies
are doing good business from Banaras flight. Can we say Buddha Air could not
compete with them?
We have not reached at the
level where we can compete with Indian airline companies. Simiarly, we cannot
surpass the market of Indian Airline which has been operating service in that
route since decades. Yet, we did not incur loss from the Banaras flights. But,
Banaras is seasonal destination due to religious reason. Keeping this fact in
mind, we have decided to operate service on this routefor six months only.
It is said that Buddha Air
has given less priority to the destinations of the neighbouring countries
because it will start its service to other lucrative international
destinations. Is it true?
I do not decline it
completely. But we will not take decision in haste. First we should have strong
presence in the areas where we have been operating our services at present. We
have to be very competitive to start international flights. It seems that
airline companies that have been operating service in Nepal are profit oriented
than service. In such situation, the possibility of profit is high in this
sector. But, Buddha Air has not reached a level where it can compete with
renowned international brands such as Thai, Qatar, Etihad and others. So, we
will not go to the international market for next four to five years.
There is neck to neck
competition in the domestic airline market. What will be your strategies to
maintain your market share?
We have established our
brand image as a company which regularly pays tax, which is employees friendly
and which serves a million passenger in a year.
We will not be adding number of aircraft for the coming few years.
Similarly, we have plan to sell a Beechcraft. Currently, we have nine aircraft.
We will sell a 18-seater and reduced the number of aircraft to eight.
Similarly, we have been trying to enhance our capacity. We have to make profit
to keep our employees satisfied. So our goal is to make profit by ethical
business practices.
Audit report of ICAO has
showed Nepal as a high-risk zone. Private airline companies blame Nepal’s
regulator CAAN of trying to introduce an impractical rule based on the audit
report. Do you agree?
We should let regulator
work independently. It has right to monitor and regulate the entire sector.
But, it is not fair to disregard the flight captains in the name of new
regulation. Another issue is that the regulator has made it mandatory to keep a
deposit of Rs 50 million. This provision
is not acceptable. First, regulatory body should not be politicized. It should
not blame ICAO to cover its own incompetency.
So don’t you abide by the
provisions of Air Operator Certificate Requirements which the regulator has
recently introduced?
We cannot afford same
deposit amount as the international airlines are required to offer. We have
already expressed our dissatisfaction over such provision. We will stop all
international flights if the government tries to implement it forcefully. We
cannot continue our Banaras flight by depositing Rs 50 million. The regulation
which is formulated for jet planes should not be forced for small aircraft too.
Nepal’s airline safety
situation seems deteriorating every consecutive year. Cannot we say that this
is due to airline operators who are not abiding the regulator?
Nepali sky is obviously
more risky compared to European sky. Nepal’s geography is dangerous compared to
many other countries in the world. But we have failed to avoid many accidents
that could have been easily avoided, such as those were caused by minor human
error. Many accidents had taken place due to negligence on the part of airline
companies and human resource involved in the operation. Regulator does not have
sufficient manpower to monitor effectively. I do not blame this on weak legal
provisions. We all should leave our habit of breaching the law. All should be
abide by the regulation.
Poor operation technology
is also blamed for the frequent air accident in Nepal. Do you feel so?
Both Instrumental Flight
Rule (IFR) and Visual Flight Rule (VFR) have their own procedures and rules.
Crew members should follow all the process including maintaining height and
distance in all flights. Similarly, some airports have some specific rules.
Crew members should follow those rules too. New technology can only facilitate
the process. The main question is whether we follow all due processes strictly.
I think all should follow international standards while operating airlines
services. Buddha Air is very much conscious about this.
In Nepal, there is no
stability in the number of airline companies. How to address this problem?
Yes it is fact.
Sustainability of airline companies is a crucial question in Nepal. There were
so many good airline companies when Buddha Air started its operation. Most of
them have already closed down. Owners should be serious to the problems that
may occur in this business for the sustainability of the company. Companies
should be updated time and again. Concerned company should give special
attention for the capacity building of employees.
Buddha Air is criticized
as being focused on profit oriented destinations only. It has not started
operation in rural areas so far though it had pledged to do so. What do you
say?
We want to start our
operation in remote areas. But we don’t have appropriate aircraft to do so. We
have planned to start service in the remote areas after getting hold in the
international flights. Buddha Air had tried to buy an aircraft to start service
in the remote destinations but the price of aircraft skyrocketed and we could
not afford that. It is bitter reality that we cannot operate service in
loss.
So what are major
preconditions to start service in remote parts?
The first condition is infrastructure. The government should
invest in infrastructure. There should be road connectivity. Then, locals will
have options whether to travel by air or by road. The government should be
clear also regarding subsidy and other schemes to operate services in the
remote parts.
We often hear about
syndicate among airline companies to fix air fare? What is the reality?
The government has fixed
the maximum ceiling on the fare. For instance, upper limit of the air fare to
Biratnagar is Rs 6,700. Airline companies have been following the ceiling set
by the government. I do not think there is similarity in air fare among all
airline companies.
No comments:
Post a Comment